Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters.

You are kindly invited to share your valuable experiences and insights about good practices in civil protection and disaster risk management.

For the ROADMAP2 project, we are mapping novel practices that are in the focus of EU Disaster Resilience Goal 1 „Anticipate – To improve risk assessment and anticipation“, including practices of strategic foresight in disaster risk management planning; Goal 2 „Prepare - To increase risk awareness and preparedness of the population“ and Goal 5 „Secure - To ensure a robust civil protection system“, including efficient engagement of civil society and volunteers.

The following questions help to identify good practices regarding these goals in a systematic way. In addition to  a brief description of each practice, we kindly ask you to specify where further information can be found regarding this practice by adding links to relevant web resources and listing people who could be contacted for further information if needed.

 

Your contribution is highly appreciated.
ROADMAP2 team

 

There are 6 questions in this survey.

Enhancing risk awareness

First, we are mapping risk and crisis communication practices that have been introduced or redesigned by civil protection authorities after the recent major disasters, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, floods, wildfires, and so on.

1. Which practices have improved people’s access to risk/crisis information? (e.g., examples of new or improved channels/tools of communication that have been launched to cater for people with various needs, resources, habits, or impairments). 

Please describe the practice(s)/tool(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

2. Which practices have improved the understandability of risk/crisis information? (e.g., presenting information in multiple languages, using simple language, debunking false information/rumours)

Please describe the practice(s)/tool(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

3. Which practices have enhanced people’s ability and/or willingness to react adequately upon risk/crisis information? (e.g., ways to warn and assist people who distrust civil protection authorities and mainstream media, or who do not have resources necessary to follow official guidelines)

Please describe the practice(s)/tool(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

Civil protection authorities engaging civil society and volunteers

Second, we are mapping practices used by civil protection authorities in engaging and empowering citizens and communities to increase preparedness and capacities to respond in disasters. Please also state tools and practices for engaging individuals that are already in vulnerable situation (e.g. individuals with disabilities, marginalised, elderly, minors).

4. Which tools and practices have been used for engaging citizens and communities in building disaster preparedness and response capacities in advance of a disaster? (e.g. ways to engage communities in reviewing their risks and coping capacities, in establishing local support teams, in building material and physical preparedness)

Please describe the practice(s)/tool(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

5. Which tools and practices have been used for engaging citizens and communities in response to and recovery from a disaster? (e.g. ways to engage spontaneous volunteers, ways to mobilise community organisations in support of response by first responders)

Please describe the practice(s)/tool(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

Strategic foresight practices

Third, we are mapping strategic foresight practices that have been used in the field of disaster risk management.

6. Which strategic foresight practices in disaster management planning do you know of?  (Practices of incorporating longer-term, e.g. 2040 perspective, strategic thinking in disaster risk analyses through e.g. horizon-scanning, megatrend analysis or scenario analyses)

Please describe the practice(s) and include links to website(s) and contact(s) for further information.

Contributor

(This question is mandatory)
 
Close